§ JOURNAL · REACT ENGINEERINGJournal 025

React frontends built like furniture.

Next.js, Remix, React Native. Frontends built like furniture — square, joinery visible, tested.

READ
5 min
§ I — COVER

The context behind the article.

Journal 0255 min
VISUAL DIRECTION

Next.js, Remix, React Native. Frontends built like furniture — square, joinery visible, tested.

BRIEF

Next.js, Remix, React Native. Frontends built like furniture — square, joinery visible, tested.

WHY IT MATTERS

This entry exists to make the operating logic visible: not just the system we would build, but the constraint, tradeoff, or failure mode that forced the architecture to matter.

§ II — ARTICLE

The text.

The React stack is now an ecosystem

There is no single "React stack" anymore. There is Next.js for SEO-bearing surfaces and full-stack apps. There is Remix for forms-and-data web apps. There is React Native for shared mobile codebases. There is plain React on top of Vite when the app is genuinely a single-page client.

Picking correctly between these is half the work.

How we build a React frontend

  • Server components by default when the data layer permits it, client components when interactivity demands it
  • Type-safe data flow from the database edge to the rendered DOM
  • Design system components owned by the team, not imported from a third party that may not exist in two years
  • Accessibility verified in CI, not after a launch
  • Performance budgets enforced on bundle size, LCP, and INP

Joinery visible

We do not hide framework conventions behind clever abstractions. New engineers should be able to read a route, find its data source, and trace the render path without a tour.

Mobile when it fits

React Native shares a meaningful amount of code with web React, but it is not free. We use it when a product needs native presence on two platforms with shared logic.


A frontend codebase ages well when the next engineer can read it without a guide.

Season