Web3 & Blockchain
systems.
We work on protocol engineering, contract systems, and supporting infrastructure where mistakes are public, expensive, and hard to roll back.
The control view.
We work on protocol engineering, contract systems, and supporting infrastructure where mistakes are public, expensive, and hard to roll back.
What we can build.
SentinelProtocol
Basic event alerts, Twitter-based incident discovery, and brittle in-house monitoring scripts.
Initial release is Ethereum-only with rule-based invariant checks, Discord and Telegram alerting, and manual pause workflows.
$1.5k-$8k/mo by protected TVL
DAOVerify
Manual calldata review, unreadable forum-post hex, and ad hoc fork scripts.
Version one supports major governance flows, simulation output, and manual execution approval for beta DAOs.
$2k-$8k/mo
TreasuryPilot
Idle treasury balances, spreadsheet allocation planning, and inconsistent multisig execution.
Initial release is read-only monitoring and recommendation-first, with execution layered in after audit and trust-building.
20 bps on managed assets or $1k+/mo minimum
Where real value opens.
Smart contract runtime anomaly detection
Protocol engineering and security teams
Most protocols still discover exploits from Twitter or Discord instead of their own runtime monitoring stack.
A protocol-specific invariant monitor that watches reserves, health factors, and abnormal flows, then triggers pause workflows fast.
DAO execution verification layer
Treasury committees and multisig operators
The riskiest governance step is still turning approved intent into exact calldata that non-engineers cannot verify.
A simulation and review layer between passed proposal and execution, with human-readable impact reports and signer coordination.
Treasury yield automation with guardrails
DAO treasury leads
Protocols hold idle stablecoins because nobody trusts manual treasury moves to happen consistently or safely.
A governance-parameterized allocation engine that recommends or executes yield moves within strict exposure limits.
Bodies that shape the field.
The system route.
Surface
Solidity, Cairo, Move
Pressure
Irreversibility raises the cost of design mistakes, not just code mistakes.
Watchpoint
Protocol teams are iterating quickly on-chain but lack dependable deployment, treasury, or governance tooling off-chain.
Proof
Contract systems and support tooling that are easier to reason about before and after launch.
Forces that warp the build.
Irreversibility raises the cost of design mistakes, not just code mistakes.
Security review and formal methods need to shape the build from the beginning.
Protocol operations require strong tooling around deployments, key management, and incident response.
On-chain systems still depend on off-chain services that need conventional reliability engineering.
What tends to break first.
Protocol teams are iterating quickly on-chain but lack dependable deployment, treasury, or governance tooling off-chain.
Security review is being treated like a final gate instead of a design constraint from day one.
Operational ownership is fuzzy once the contracts ship, so incident response and key-handling feel improvised.
What remains after the engagement.
Contract systems and support tooling that are easier to reason about before and after launch.
Security practices embedded into design, verification, deployment, and operational response.
A steadier off-chain control surface for treasury, governance, observability, and incident handling.
How we enter and leave.
We are brought in for protocol launches, contract refactors, and the off-chain systems that keep treasury, governance, and operations from becoming chaos.
The work is successful when teams can move with confidence under adversarial conditions, not when the stack merely looks sophisticated.
If this operating environment looks familiar, we can scope the first tranche of work, the control surface, and the delivery cadence.